Germany’s election results are said to be the last Sunday as expected. The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, won the game with ease. Her fourth prime minister made her the longest postwar member of Parliament, second only to Otto von Bismarck and Germany’s longest serving prime minister.
Beneath the surface, however, elections marked the German political earthquake. Similar to changes in submarine earthquakes, May 1st seemed benign before the inevitable tsunami struck.
Before the election, between the two major political parties in Germany the CDU / CSU and SPD, 504 of the 598 seats in the Bundestag, respectively 311 and 193. After Sunday’s vote, Germany’s two largest political parties held a combined 399 seats. The CDU / CSU lost 65 seats, while the SPD lost 40.
They still have 399 combination number, enough to ensure that most of them if they choose to rule in the league or major league gro E Schnuffel. This time, however, is not an option. Right, instead of F R Germany / replace Germany (AFD) won 12.6% of the vote, won 89 seats, the third largest party in germany.
If the group in Angela and Merkel CDU / CSU grand coalition, then Germany will become the official opposition. Many people fear that political legitimacy will be seen as a reactionary fringe movement.
Some important trends buried in the election results. AFD, about 11% in the former West Germany, was in fourth place, trailing the Liberal Democrats only. In the former East Germany, however, they won 22% of the vote, leaving a solid second place. What’s more, they won most of the male votes.
It has been criticized as reactionary and Nazi overruled. Sigmar Gabriel, a former chairman of the Social Democratic Party, echoed the German media widely comments and political circles, he said, “since the end of the Second World War the first true Nazi in Germany parliament.”
AFD is opposed to loose immigration policies, the implementation of the national quota of illegal immigrants and refugees, the European union. This is their deciding question. Their nationalism, xenophobia, and anti European Union argue that the third world countries that have increased their immigration into Germany are, in particular, the threat of Muslim immigrants to the German culture and society.

Of course they have their political cave people sharing, perhaps more than they are, but they are not nazis. They are the same phenomenon, prompting Britain to withdraw from Europe and vote for Donald Tran in the United Kingdom. In the United States, they no longer support Britain’s retreat from Europe or the performance of Donald Trump Nazi germany.
Immigration has become a lightning rod for the working class, and they feel increasingly marginalized and ignored by the political class. Even in rich Germany with a jobless rate of 3.9%, the anxieties of the working class are increasingly expressed as anti immigration and anti EU sentiment.
It is not the employment opportunity of the working class; it is immigrants, laws or others. Most of the refugees accepted by Germany are not yet integrated into the labour force. Similarly, the reduction in us blue collar workers is driven by technological change and outsourcing to low wage countries rather than illegal immigrants taking American jobs.
But there is a thread that runs through these different political developments. Decades of political integration have deprived the identity and legitimacy of the main political parties in Europe and the north. Although they may clearly distinguish between political platforms, there is little difference in the way they govern when they are in the government.
Moreover, the centre of development, the left political party and the new economic agenda are often at the expense of the interests of the working womens bikinis sale  class. They become increasingly marginalized and anxious about their future and found a group in the high-tech, the global economic environment, they are vulnerable to technological innovation and jobs to low wage countries job losses.
The economic benefits of globalization and high-tech automation may be convincing, but its logic has been ignored by those who work in globalization or automation. The choice is not between protectionism and policies that limit innovation, but rather between expanding unemployment benefits or ignoring the increasingly backward part of society.
The New Democratic Party and the New Labour Party may have been successful political tactics in the short term, but they have succeeded in weakening the legitimacy of the historic rights of western politics for a long time.